« THIS IS AVIVA | Main | WHAT'S THAT? YOU WANT MORE? WELL, ALL RIGHT, JUST THIS ONCE... »

ONE MORE TIME, BECAUSE IT'S RAINING AND I CAN'T DRAW ANYTHING NEW

model 05_003.jpg

The model, by the way, is Kira, and she's one of these people who can stand rock-still for a half hour as if she had been hit by a blast from one of those stun-phaser-gun things that actors used to carry around in sci-fi movies, the kind with rings around the barrel that you could get for yourself with 50 Wheaties boxtops when I was a kid, but I was always disappointed that they were just toy replicas and not the real things. My ultimate goal was to secure a real one, so that instead of immobilizing mayhem-inclined aliens like those fools in the movies, I would aim it at the nearest woman and then take her clothes off. First ascertaining, of course, that the nearest woman wasn't my Mom. Now that I'm a artist, I have an excuse for seeing naked women on a regular basis, but the odd thing is that when a naked person is in modelspace, he or she is transformed into a different being, not entirely an object, but something like that--a cloak of neutrality rests on their shoulders. One thing that I've never really captured in my figure drawing is the sense of a real person without any clothes on; it always comes out as a stylized art object. That's what I love about the work of Lucian Freud or some of Alice Neel's drawings--the visceral shock of confronting a naked person.In fact, I think there should be more naked people, men and women, scattered through real life, just to give you an occasional jolt. We would pay them, of course. It would be better than mimes.

Posted on Thursday, April 12, 2007 at 08:55AM by Registered CommenterSparky Donatello | Comments10 Comments

Reader Comments (10)

yes and that modelspace is quite specific to the model. At my last class the model was late so one of my fellow artists said he would pose. So I thought yeah clothes are interesting, I need practice, so it was quite a shock when he took his clothes off.
April 12, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterJulie Oakley
Reminds me of that old Dan Aykroyd routine. The art critic looking at Manet's <i>Luncheon on the Grass</i> and snickering, "Bon appetit, boys." I guess a 150-year-old picture of a random nude among clothed men still jolts.
April 13, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterPeter
Egon Shiele, too. Highly stylized art objects, but very naked too... Is it because we are tempted to make pretty things, which shy away from the risks inherent in striving for the inner beautiful? Or maybe because in group drawing sessions there is the social aspect which kills intimacy. The social mask is in place in a way that might concievably break down in a one on one situation... How many of us, artists or models, are really willing to go there?
April 13, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterartmark
How about confronting yourself in the nude, painting yourself. How about painting a nude sex scene? Yourself in a nude sex scene.

A fellow who lived down the road from me was a nudist. I had to pass his house on the way to work or town. He was always outside at the busiest commute hours, somewhat of an exhibitionist. He was a wizen old man who rode his tractor in the nude and was out rain or shine. At first I shied away from looking at him. Through the years I got used to him and would stop to chat with him.

There are a series of Dove (Soap) ads using older women in the nude. A friend of mine said 'Isn't that awful'. I thought it was lovely.
April 13, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterreikopm
WAY better than mimes!
April 14, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterLydia
Done the nude self portrait thing, reikopm, but still find myself doing stylized art objects. Nude sex scene? that would shake things up, but how to avoid doing stylized porn scenes? Oneself in a sex scene from life... I don't know if I can draw that fast ;)
April 14, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterArtmark
If anyone would have given that assignment a shot, it would have been Artmark. If he can't bring it off, I sure can't. Anyway, I've never been good at drawing people laughing.
April 14, 2007 | Registered CommenterSparky Donatello
Self portrait nude, to me it's interesting to see what I choose to include and leave out, or modify. It says a lot about how we see ourselves, the things we like or do not like.
Sparky says 'the visceral shock of confronting a nude person', should we ask ourselves why is it a shock? And maybe this is the reason for the stylized 'objects'. And doesn't that say a lot?
Sex scenes: Another way to confront how we feel. Not good or bad, just a chance to look at ourselves. Art can be a way to communicate in a non-verbal way, not only to others but to ourselves as well.
April 16, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterreikopm
Does this mean you've done nude self-portraits, reikopm? So where are they?
April 16, 2007 | Unregistered CommenterSparky
I have only done 2, one 14 years ago, and one just the other day. One digitized in a collage and online at, http://www.flickr.com/photos/reikopm/458395146/in/set-72157594158736476/

I am not an artist, I use art for therapy, to discover things in myself that I am unable to communicate in other ways. My current project is a study of the selves within me, to bring them to the surface.

In my self portrait nude, the things I've left out, the face, an unwillingness to face myself in the nude? My ugly parts, rolls of fat, wrinkles, lumpy legs, shows my vanity. The breasts are larger than mine, non acceptance of the self. Good things, a willingness to look at myself naked, an exposure of the vunerable parts, acceptance of the piece with imperfections.
April 19, 2007 | Unregistered Commenterreikopm

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>